Lizi Gray, final year Sociology student and Feminist activist, examines intimate partner violence and the role of the education and justice systems:
So many of you will have read about the horrific situation at Sussex University where senior lecturer Dr Lee Salter was allowed to continue teaching until media inquiries began coming in about him. The inquiries were made regarding his relationship with a student and the abuse she faced from him. When I saw this I doubt I was alone in my first reaction containing liberal use of expletives; therefore, this is an edited version of my first reaction. It made me sick to my stomach. I cried with anger. I screamed in frustration.
It’s 2016, why was this allowed to happen?
Salter received a six-month sentence, suspended for eight, and given the extent of her injuries it further added to the confusion I had about this case. He was in a position of power both inside and outside of the classroom, he actively made the choice to abuse this power, he actively made the choice to abuse Allison Smith. A six-month sentence that he will most likely not serve doesn’t even put a dent in justice for her.
Something else that occurred to me though, while reading about similar cases, is how prevalent a trend this is. Campaigns by police encouraging people to come forward and report domestic violence, politicians making promises that there will be help and support for victims and survivors; when cases like this make headlines – they only make up a small fraction of cases of domestic violence – it cuts through this rhetoric and exposes those promises for the lip service they are. We are angry, extremely angry, that a) in the 21st century we still have to protest the injustice victims face and b) a higher education institute, a place of learning, somewhere that is meant to be progressive and at the forefront of fighting against these issues enabled an abuser. They allowed him to teach in an environment with potentially vulnerable young people, where he has easy access to young people to manipulate and exploit. And to pour salt in the wound? They are paying nine grand a year for this.
The Education System
By keeping him on with a violent criminal conviction they are sending a message to (mostly) women students that higher education is not a place for them. That their fees are being used to keep him there, allowing the university to say “look at what a good lecturer we have, your safety is secondary to us being able to show him off”. Myself and others who have been involved with Student Union campaigns against intimate partner violence and domestic violence, through our institutions and nationally through the NUS, are blue in the face and sick to the back teeth of shouting about this as an issue; yet normally we focus on on-campus, student-against-student violence. But violence from a lecturer against a student is a new one for many of us. It took 3,000 people signing a petition for the university to finally cave and for Salter to lose his job.
Think of it this way: if they had been ‘just friends’, or ‘just student and teacher’, and he committed the acts he did against here what would the public reaction be? What would the judicial reaction be? Would he be behind bars for grievous bodily harm? Quite possibly. Would the university have kept him as a lecturer? Definitely not. He would be a risk to students. Oh wait… But because they were in an intimate relationship did that make it less serious? The old approach of ‘a private matter’, ‘a lovers’ tiff’? This is by no stretch of the imagination me placing any blame on Allison because she was in a relationship with a lecturer, this is a shocked reaction that the charge was likely a lesser one because they were intimately involved.
The (In)Justice System
This brings me onto part two, primarily about his sentence. It also goes back to 2014 when I was assaulted by a man on the Metro, along with several others he attacked that day. The case came to court in May 2015 (swift justice anybody?). For a month spent doped up on painkillers for the shoulder injury I received, what were probably hundreds of calls to the police to see how the case was progressing, and a fear of using the Metro alone which still stands to this day, myself and the others he injured received £50 compensation each. He received a fine and probation. We received trauma and anger. He is free, more so than the lasting effects have left me feeling.
In my second year of university I took a module called Gender, Crime and Justice; the content covered everything from women as victims of crime to women who commit crimes, the types of crimes, and the punishments they receive. The course was taught by Pam Davies, she’s extremely experienced in the field of gender and the criminal justice service, it was one of my favourites of the year. What left me gobsmacked was the types of crimes women tend to be prosecuted and imprisoned for. The most recent statistics reveal that women make up less than 5% of the total UK prison population (3,898 out of 85,188 in August 2016). While these figures erase Trans* and Non-Binary offenders it does show the staggering difference in prison population makeup. Fraud, theft and drug charges make up the most common types of offences committed by women in prison;only 19% of women in prison are there for violent crimes.
Could somebody please justify to me how there are over 3,000 women in prison for non-violent crimes, yet men like Lee Salter are allowed – by law – to continue having their freedom? Now some might argue that the media backlash against him, losing his job may indicate that he’s lost some of his freedom, despite not being in prison. But really? He is an abuser who is allowed to carry on roaming the streets, having the freewill and agency that he wouldn’t behind bars, and not living in fear of, well, people like himself.